What are secure assessments?

Secure assessments are supervised tasks that directly evaluate a student's individual achievement of learning outcomes. These tasks may be conducted in person or online, and supervision can be human- or technology-based.

What defines a secure assessment is not the format, but the confidence it provides in the authenticity of students' works. These tasks are designed so educators can make trustworthy judgments about what students know and can do.

Secure assessments are essential - but they are not the whole picture. When combined with well-designed open assessments, they ensure students are prepared both to demonstrate individual capabilities and to apply their learning in complex, real-world contexts.

At ACU, we use a balanced strategy for assessment that incorporates secure and open assessments to create a valid, inclusive and future-focused learning experience for our students.

Secure assessments:

  • Are in real-time and/or are interactive, such as interactive oral assessments, or practical demonstrations.
  • Involve restricted or full use of generative GenAI, depending on what the task is assessing and the discipline requires.
  • Include scaffolded preparation that builds students' GenAI literacy, where applicable.
  • Accommodate reasonable adjustments for students as per the 'Students with Disabilities' Policy.

Why use secure assessments?

Secure assessments are a crucial part of a balanced assessment strategy. They:

  • Ensure assessment validity by confirming students' own capabilities.
  • Help meet external accreditation or professional requirements where individual performance must be verified.
  • Support TEQSA's call for institutions to make "trustworthy judgments about student learning in a time of AI" (TEQSA, 2024).
  • Are not designed to eliminate GenAI entirely - rather, they are designed to allow GenAI use where it is educationally appropriate, while ensuring confidence in the learning demonstrated.

Secure assessments in an online environment

In online courses, such as those offered through ACU Online, secure assessments remain essential for assuring the integrity and credibility of student achievement.

Secure assessments in a fully online context can include:

  • Timed online exams using virtual proctoring tools that record or monitor student activity during assessment.
  • Oral assessments conducted via scheduled video calls, where students explain or defend their work.
  • Interactive tasks such as live coding challenges, structured case analysis, or simulations, where responses are captured in real time.
  • Written tasks that are completed using technologies that monitor students' writing behaviours.

To ensure equity and effectiveness, educators designing secure assessments for completely online learning would consider:

  • Clear communication of assessment conditions.
  • Scaffolded preparation, especially where new technologies (such as proctoring or GenAI tools) are involved.
  • Accessibility and inclusion, ensuring reasonable adjustments are made for students with diverse needs or limited internet/technology access.
  • Time-zone sensitivity and flexible windows, especially for oral tasks, to accommodate asynchronous learners.

How to plan for secure assessments

Designing secure assessment is optimised through three coordinated steps:

Designing secure assessment is optimised through three coordinated steps:

Ideally, secure assessments are mapped across the entire course (or sequence) to ensure each course learning outcome is assessed through multiple, diverse, supervised tasks. This is usually completed by the discipline or course lead.

When building a secure assessment map:

  • Identify where in the course students are expected to demonstrate specific learning outcomes independently. Not all assessments, nor all units will need to be secured.
  • Plan a variety of supervised assessment types across the course to reflect different forms of knowledge or skill (e.g. interactive oral tasks, supervised practical demonstrations, invigilated written tasks).
  • Ensure alignment with course learning outcomes, professional accreditation requirements, and graduate attributes and capabilities.

This map provides the course-level structure that ensures ACU can stand behind the quality and integrity of student achievement.

 

Once secure assessments have been mapped across the course, unit assessment strategies can be designed that fit within this broader plan.

In planning a unit’s secure assessment:

  • Begin with the unit learning outcomes and ask: What needs to be demonstrated individually?
  • Consider the stakes and purpose of the task, and whether secure conditions will ensure validity - don’t secure an assessment solely to restrict GenAI.
  • Consider diverse student needs and accessibility.
  • Consider the learning mode, cohort characteristics, and scaffolding required for students to succeed.

Secure assessments should make sense within the broader rhythm and workload of the unit, and be coordinated with other assessments – both secure and open – to ensure balance and fairness.

With the course-level mapping and unit assessment strategy in place, designing the specific secure assessment task can now happen.

A secure assessment task:

  • Is aligned with the intended learning outcomes.
  • Is conducted in real-time under observable conditions.
  • May include full or restricted use of GenAI, depending on the knowledge and skills being assessed.
  • Uses clear criteria and provides students with guidance and preparation.
  • Is designed to be inclusive and equitable, recognising student diversity and access needs.

Tip sheets for secure assessment types

Below are tip sheets for some of the more popular forms of secure assessment tasks. These tip sheets include information about the type of assessment, the learning outcomes they best serve, the learning design considerations associated with them, how GenAI could be integrated, and the possible resourcing implications of each.

Kim, J., & Danilina, E. (2025). Towards inclusive and equitable assessment practices in the age of GenAI: Revisiting academic literacies for multilingual students in academic writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2456223

Luo (Jess), J., Keung, C. P. C., & Tang, H. hang H. (2025). Assessment as a dilemmatic space in the GenAI age: Mapping and unpacking university teachers' conflicting priorities in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2444890

Pallant, J. L., Blijlevens, J., Campbell, A., & Jopp, R. (2025). Mastering knowledge: The impact of generative AI on student learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2487570

Page last updated on 11/07/2025

Service Central

Visit Service Central to access Corporate Services.


Other service contacts


Learning and Teaching
Library
Request Something

Make a request for services provided by Corporate Services.


Request something
Knowledge base

Find answers to frequently asked questions 24/7.


See Knowledge Base